MJD is there for extra "GTFO" juice, don't really need it if you pay attention though so can replace it with more tank or another TP and ruse FURY missiles for more DPS vs battleships.Įxcellent fit! i liked the look of it so much that i rebuilt it in pyfa to see all the stats. Pithum C-Type Thermic Dissipation AmplifierĬruise Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Inferno Cruise Missileġ280 DPS with my skills and +3% missile hardwirings, warp in at 70, kill frigs with sentries before they get close, kill neuting battleships/cruisers before they get in range, sit back and count the isk lol. I was in INIT mercs not too long ago and ratted my ass off in one in Querious, and that was before (and after) the recent buffing. If you are only getting 975 DPs out of a rattlesnake, your' doing something way way wrong lol.
EVE QUERIOUS RATS MODS
It has a lot of mid slots for nice things like the MJD, target painters or mods that help drones while still having enough mids for tank. It gets bonus to Thermal Damage (sure, BRs are weaker against EM, but the bonus makes up for that). It uses drones and missiles so the tracking disrupting Blood Raiders do doesn't affect you at all. You can passive tank it, so neuts don't matter. The Rattlesnake is one of the BEST Blood Ratting ships. Well there is always the option of having a few characters in smartbomb battleships that kill everything as it spawns. although since your post got censored, I'm not sure if you are saying your rattlesnake has too much tank, or not enough. although at that point you can probably get 1500 out of a rattlesnake. paladin or nightmare would probably be next best. I'm not all that sure you can do much better than a rattlesnake.
We'll have to send some 'techs' onsite to, uh, diagnose the problem with the Rattler. I use the rattlesnake atm but 975 dps with a kinda ****** tank im looking for some thing better. I would like a bloodraiders ratting ship. Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) » Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google
0 kommentar(er)
